Humph ([info]spiralsheep) wrote,
@ 2006-08-19 14:40:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current location:Marvel Universe
Current mood:Stormy
Entry tags:anti-racism, comics, ethics, feminism, storm, thinkitude

In which our heroine asks, "What would T'Challa do?"
As an aside in Pam Noles' excellent recent post about the Black Panel at Comic Con, in which she reiterates that some black men should stop their sexism towards black women, she mentioned Eric Jerome Dickey as an example of a man who writes black women well. I'm glad Pam Noles enjoys his work and I'm glad he's an extremely successful author. I can't judge Dickey's novels because I've never read any of them but I've read his Storm comics and I have a few problems with them especially when I compare the story they tell to Storm's first origin story as told by Chris Claremont and John Byrne.

I didn't say anything at the time because I didn't want to incidentally draw anyone's attention away from the important discussion of the panel. I also know that most professional writers have both strong and weak points in their writing abilities and, as readers, we all like different styles.

I'm into character. I'll turn a blind eye to all kinds of crack-addled plots and expository dialogue if a writer manages good characterisation but there're some things I can't pretend aren't happening such as when an achievement by a character who is part of an underrepresented group in comics is taken away from that character and given to someone else for no reason; when an actively self-determined female character is rewritten to take her self-determination away from her for no reason; when a black character's ethics are rewritten to appear more criminal especially when that black character's relationship with a white character, who was originally presented as a criminal himself, is rewritten so he's now a white victim of her crime and she's the black perpetrator of that crime*.

I have no problem with past canon being rewritten because of an overwhelming necessity within the story. Yes, I might grumble about it when a plot point I liked is retrospectively altered, because I'm a fan and we do that, but if the new canon is worthy of the change then I'm not going to hold a grudge. If the new canon is worthy of the change. But when a writer takes an achievement, a genuine victory, away from one character and gives it to another then there'd better be a good reason, when a writer takes away a female character's self-determination and gives it to the men around her there'd better be a good reason, and when a writer turns a black victim of white crime into a black perpetrator of crime against a white person then there'd better be a !%@%! good reason.

So when Eric Jerome Dickey decided to rewrite the established history of Ororo and T'Challa's first meeting, the time when Ororo saved T'Challa from the eeevilwhitefolks, and changed it so that T'Challa rescued Ororo the black criminal, there was a good reason for that right? Right? Except there was no good reason at all. Dickey took a self-determined black woman's achievements away from her so he could give them to other people for no reason other than his personal preference as a storyteller.

Dickey took a black woman's self-determination, her decision to leave her familiar life as an urban street-child who survived by thieving and walk (literally) into the unknown in search or something better, and rewrote that self-determined young woman as an inveterate thief forced to flee from the consequences of her crime. Dickey took the same self-determined black woman's decision to intervene on behalf of a stranger who was under attack and gave that decision and intervention to a black man. Dickey took the same self-determined black woman's victory in battle and gave that victory to a black man. Dickey took a story about a young woman with superpowers rescuing a young man who was a half-trained warrior with no special powers and turned it around so the half-trained male warrior saved the superpowered female.

Let's be blunt. The purpose of Marvel Comics' Storm mini-series featuring Ororo and T'Challa and written by Dickey was commercial: to sell more comics, to sell more comics specifically to black readers who're perceived as being more open to black characters, to sell more graphic novels to women readers who're perceived as more open to romance novels than to superhero comics, to sell the idea of a Storm and Black Panther wedding to existing fans of those characters, and to prop up the falling sales of the current series of Black Panther comics written by Reginald Hudlin.

Dickey's preferred way to sell an Ororo and T'Challa relationship was to make Ororo more criminal, less self-determined and less heroic while he simultaneously made T'Challa more self-determined and more heroic.

I wonder what T'Challa would have said about that?

Imagine for a moment that T'Challa isn't a character on a page, he's a real man, in a real situation. The situation is an interview which T'Challa has granted to an author who's writing an unofficial biography of Ororo and T'Challa. Let's call this fictional author Eric Jerome Dickey. Now ask yourself: "What would T'Challa do?" ;-)

* * * * * *

T'Challa: "So, Mr Dickey, you want to give me credit for someone else's achievement?" *STARES at author*

T'Challa: "You intend to misrepresent someone else's victory in battle as if it was mine?" *STARES at author*

T'Challa: "You're perhaps implying that I, the Black Panther, King of the most technologically advanced nation on Earth, holder of a Ph.D. in physics from Oxford University, winner of more battles than I can remember, so sorely lack achievements of my own that you must credit me with someone else's?" *STARES at author*

T'Challa: "You perhaps chose to believe it might be undignified for a man to be protected by a woman?" *looks pointedly at his female bodyguards the Dora Milaje*

Female bodyguards: *both STARE at author*

T'Challa: "You perhaps feel that your readers, who are mostly American men like my friends the Falcon and Captain America, are so insecure about their masculinity they can't understand the value of a powerful female ally, team-mate or partner?" *STARES at author*

T'Challa: "This interview is at an end. Goodbye Mr Dickey." *narrows eyes*

T'Challa: *waits until author is almost out of earshot*

T'Challa: "And don't let Wakanda's door smack your ass too hard on your way out!"

T'Challa: *Panther grin*

Female bodyguards: *secretly fangirl T'Challa*

* * * * * *


*Note: yes, I'm aware that the single, white, de Ruyter character in Storm's first origin story by Claremont and Byrne was subsequently rewritten as two brothers by Dickey but that makes no difference to the ethical shift.

Relevant comics: Uncanny Origins 9 by Jim Alexander and Marc Campos
Uncanny X-Men 267 by Chris Claremont and Homage Studios
Uncanny X-Men 102 by Chris Claremont and Dave Cockrum
Uncanny X-Men 226 by Chris Claremont and Marc Silvestri
Marvel Team-Up (vol.1) 100 by Chris Claremont and John Byrne (reprinted in Marvel Milestones 14)
Black Panther (vol.2) 26 by Priest and Sal Velluto (reprinted in Marvel Milestones 14)
Storm (mini-series 2006) 1-6 by Eric Jerome Dickey and David Yardin and Lan Medina

Linguistic disclaimer: I'm British. I speak English. We say black. I'm aware that not everyone shares my linguistic sensibilities.

Ethical disclaimer: my comparison of the different criminal actions presented in the two differing versions of the story doesn't imply a real-world ethical judgement, on my part, of street-children who steal to survive.


(Post a new comment)


[info]sventhelost
2006-08-19 02:19 pm UTC (link)
A very interesting analysis! I haven't read any of the X-men stuff, though I enjoyed the first couple of movies. I can certainly see your point!

I've seen lots of bad stuff happen when the people writing things try to think "This is what I think X demographic wants to read," rather than, "This is a cool story I have to tell."

And I agree that characters are the most important thing in stories. That's often why I don't like sequels, because the thing we suffered through with the character in the first movie and that we overcame with her, is generally completely ignored in the second, because the people making it think we care more about the story or some bizarre formula than about the character.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]spiralsheep
2006-08-19 03:30 pm UTC (link)
Thank you.

I've only seen the first x-film (I think) which I enjoyed although movieverse Rogue takes some getting used to if you grew up with the comics version who can fly and punch her way through walls!

I think Dickey decided to write a hero-saves-girl romance-novel plot because that's what he's good at but, to me, it didn't suit the characters or their established backstory. Reginald Hudlin had already messed with T'Challa's adult backstory as the Black Panther so thoroughly that even most dedicated Black Panther fans can't figure out his intended history now. I suppose Dickey rewrote Ororo as a young woman less drastically than Hudlin had already rewritten his adult version of T'Challa. I can't really see any excuse for either writer except that they wanted to write their own ideas and didn't care if the characters fundamentally changed in the process (which is why I usually choose to write original fiction rather than fan fic).

I agree that characters are the most important thing in stories. That's often why I don't like sequels, because the thing we suffered through with the character in the first movie and that we overcame with her, is generally completely ignored in the second, because the people making it think we care more about the story or some bizarre formula than about the character.

I sometimes wonder if loving the characters and/or the fictional 'verse more than the plot or the action is what makes us actively involve ourselves as fans instead of remaining part of the more passive audience?

I grew up with a Storm in the comics who, unlike so many comics characters, received noticeable character development. She went from being reserved and reactive to being up front and proactive. Her relationships with the characters around her also changed in interesting ways as a result.

Maybe I was lucky with my teenage reading and I was spoiled because I've had difficulty finding equally interesting comics heroines to identify with since then.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]seebrirun
2006-08-20 01:28 am UTC (link)
I've only seen the first x-film (I think) which I enjoyed although movieverse Rogue takes some getting used to if you grew up with the comics version who can fly and punch her way through walls!

I grew up with the animated TV series, and had the same problem. I remember writing that Rogue was my favourite fictional character in a primary school essay for pretty much those reasons.

I think Dickey decided to write a hero-saves-girl romance-novel plot because that's what he's good at but, to me, it didn't suit the characters or their established backstory.

Which is why a very good editor would just change the pronouns and swap the dialogue around wholesale. It worked on 'The Avengers'.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]spiralsheep
2006-08-20 02:12 pm UTC (link)
I loved Rogue so much when I was a teenager (apart from the apalling phonetic faux Southern drawl accent she was lumbered with in the comics). She could fly! And punch through walls! And quite frankly, my dear, she didn't give a damn! ::squees quietly::

a very good editor would just change the pronouns and swap the dialogue around wholesale

Which would vividly demonstrate that Dickey wrote a romance novel because some of the (implied post-coital) dialogue would be even more hilarious than in the original version:

T'Challa: Do I look different? Like a WOMAN?

Ororo: How many times did you ask me that last night, T'Challa? How many times do I have to answer?

T'Challa: Do I not look like a woman now?

Ororo: Do you FEEL like a woman now?

T'Challa: Answer me.

Ororo: God, you sound like my mother.*

*Why, yes, the implication that T'Challa's ('scuse 'postrophes) mother nags him post-coitally to tell her whether she looks like a woman or not is eye-poppingly BIZARRE.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]seebrirun
2006-08-20 06:39 pm UTC (link)
The whole exchange is eye-poppingly bizzare!

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]spiralsheep
2006-08-20 08:23 pm UTC (link)
What we need is someone who'll admit to having read large quantities of romance novels to tell us whether or not Dickey's dialogue is normal for Norfolk romo.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]shilohmm
2006-08-30 07:13 pm UTC (link)
I spent two years reading romances in hopes of finding someone, anyone, as good as Georgette Heyer (and discovered there is a reason Heyer is called "the romance writer for people who hate romances"). I read some really awful stuff, but I don't remember anything remotely resembling the "am I a woman now" routine. I might buy it as a Kathleen E. Woodiwiss parody - Woodiwiss was popular in the 1970's and is considered hopelessly old fashioned now...

Movie Rogue has the same powers original comics Rogue had - the Rogue you remember was using Ms. Marvel's powers, not the powers she was born with.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]spiralsheep
2006-08-30 09:02 pm UTC (link)
I've read romances but I'm not a fan of the genre although people who dismiss romance annoy me as much as people who dismiss one of my beloved genres (there's a rant on this lj somewhere about a respected author dismissing stories which are "only" about "love" but I can't remember the tag).

I don't think the way I read the "am I a woman" dialogue can possibly mean what the author intended it to mean. He was a first time comics writer so maybe some of the blame belongs to his editors? I haven't read any of his novels so I can't compare the dialogue between his two media.

Yes, comics Rogue had the same powers as movie Rogue when she was a minor baddie and then, soon after she absorbed part of Ms Marvel's psyche, she sought Xavier's help and became an X-man so readers only really got to know her well as superstrong!Rogue. I missed the later problems Rogue had with her internal Ms Marvel after the mutant massacre so I probably missed some significant further character development. The movies were quite an adjustment for me though. Storm was my favourite character mostly because I admired her leadership qualities but Rogue was occasionally my adolescent wish-fulfillment power-fantasy. :-)

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]spiralsheep
2006-08-30 09:04 pm UTC (link)
And thank you for your opinion on the dialogue as a romance reader.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]morchades
2006-08-19 07:38 pm UTC (link)
Oh! I love this! You have me fangirling T'Challa now too!

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]spiralsheep
2006-08-19 09:00 pm UTC (link)
Thank you.

I probably wouldn't have got around to writing and posting it without inspiration from your comics blog and the links on [info]fangirls_attack.

T'Challa is definitely arrogant enough to dominate a room with other people in it to the point where he could have a one-sided conversation with himself, heh, and honourable enough for it to be that conversation.

One of the consistent characterisations of T'Challa is him being capable of breathtaking arrogance which is both one of his greatest strengths as an individual and one of his greatest weaknesses in dealing with other people. He's also consistently characterised as choosing relationships with women who, like the step-mother he grew up with, are strong enough personalities to stand up to him and point out when he's being arrogantly wrong-headed or, sometimes, when he's right-headed but he's arrogantly failed to explain why he's right-headed to the people who need to know.

Ororo has, in the past, usually been depicted as choosing not to deal with T'Challa when he's being arrogant and she's walked away instead but now they're married she doesn't realistically have that option anymore so she's going to have to tough it out with him which must be what he wants because he keeps on choosing women who're strong enough to do that.

My love for some characters can survive what any particular writer chooses to do with that character.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]morchades
2006-08-20 12:01 am UTC (link)
Well, you've managed to get me on the side of the marriage itself, though I'm still unbelieavably unhappy with the wedding issue.

If the writer could just handle it the way you described (given that this is Hudlin, I think we'll be waiting on the next guy for that).

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]spiralsheep
2006-08-20 02:26 pm UTC (link)
I don't mind the marriage because I doubt if it'll last unless it receives stellar quality writing over a long period of time which is a win-win situation as far as I'm concerned. Either two of my favourite characters are gifted with outstandingly good writing or Storm and the Black Panther will quickly end up going their seperate ways (preferably with actual character development as a result). If nothing else I have to believe Marvel wouldn't allow the ruination of one of their few much loved and high profile female characters as a commercial prospect.

Hudlin is far from my favourite comics writer but, editorially imposed crossovers aside, I think he might be improving? Although whether he manages to improve sufficiently and fast enough to keep his Black Panther series on the comic shop shelves is probably open to question at the moment. I suspect he'll choose to move to other projects when they become available to him.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]lilacsigil
2006-08-20 09:40 am UTC (link)
Great analysis! It was hard to put my finger on exactly why I felt so uncomfortable with the miniseries that I stopped reading after the first issue, but that's exactly it: I wouldn't mind seeing Storm and T'Challa stories at all, but these people aren't Storm and T'Challa. Of all the characters to randomly shoehorn into a wedding plot, these two are just...unbelievable. It's not an organic growth of character, and it makes me sad about the tightening corporate straitjacket. I don't love these characters because they're on my t-shirt, they're on my t-shirt because I love them.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]spiralsheep
2006-08-20 02:36 pm UTC (link)
Thank you.

I didn't think the mini-series was bad but, even setting aside my problems with the underlying characterisations, the writing didn't appeal to me. Some of the art was gorgeous though. Credit where credit is due.

I didn't like the actual wedding but I don't mind the marriage because I doubt if it'll last unless it receives stellar quality writing over a long period of time which is a win-win situation as far as I'm concerned. Either two of my favourite characters are gifted with outstandingly good writing or Storm and the Black Panther will quickly end up going their seperate ways (preferably with actual character development as a result). If nothing else I have to believe Marvel wouldn't allow the ruination of one of their few much loved and high profile female characters as a commercial prospect.

I don't love these characters because they're on my t-shirt, they're on my t-shirt because I love them.

Which imo is exactly what moves us from being readers into being fans. We care about the characters even in between the panels. ::squees quietly::

(Reply to this)(Parent)


Create an Account
Forgot your login?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…